Well, graphically, the game does not look bad given the performance of the PS2.

I don't know why I tried it in 2020 on PS2, but after World at War on PS3 it was interesting to look at Final Fronts. Strange spin-off, because part of the missions intersects with the original. But everything else is so Call of Duty: World at War - Final Fronts is a spin-off to the original World at War. … ExpandĬall of Duty: World at War - Final Fronts is a spin-off to the original World at War. the gameplanet's review of this game is based in the same game but for next gen consoles, such as ps3 an 360, don't let it fool ya. in conclusion, the campaign mode is fun as in every CoD, But the problem with this one is that i was hoping for co-op, online or offline multiplayer, etc. I love call of duty's in general, this one isn't pretty bad either, if you're looking for a 'good' shooter, this may be it, but you'll finish it in about 6 to 8 hours at most, and then forget it even exists. it is basically just ONE single player mode, the campaign, and that's pretty much it.

i basically bought it because it is displayed in metacritic that its up to 4 players, wrong information. I love call of duty's in general, this one isn't pretty bad either, if you're looking I love playing first person shooter games, but i felt robbed when i purchased this game. I love playing first person shooter games, but i felt robbed when i purchased this game.

Call of duty world at war ps2